Criminal Justice (Forensic Evidence and DNA Database System) Act 2014 The Act was signed by the President on 22 June, 2014. Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link. In criminal investigation, the presence of DNA evidence is deemed to have an effect on the confession made by suspects6. A DNA sample was taken from her and logged. that DNA can, and should, play in criminal justice system. In all, DNA technology is increasingly vital to ensuring accuracy and fairness in the criminal justice system. DNA is made up of four chemical bases: adenine (A), guanine (G), cytosine (C), and thymine (T). S and Marper - was lawful. The United Kingdom National DNA Database (NDNAD; officially the UK National Criminal Intelligence DNA Database) is a national DNA Databasethat was set up in 1995. Since 1998, more than 300,000 crimes have been detected with the aid of the Database, reassuring the public that offenders are more likely to be brought to justice." 124,000 were deleted for those not charged or no… As the fir… The Criminal Justice (Forensic Evidence and DNA Database System) Act, 2014 was enacted on the 22nd June 2014. 70. In 2010 she was finally able to have her details removed from the database. The Criminal Justice Act 2003 later allowed DNA to be taken on arrest, rather than on charge. On April 2010 the Crime and Security Act 2010[17] established that DNA profiles and fingerprints of anyone convicted of a recordable offence would be stored permanently, while those obtained on arrest, even when no conviction follows, would be stored for 6 years, renewable on new arrests. 66. Recordable offences include begging, being drunk and disorderly and taking part in an illegal demonstration. Because of the uniqueness and its uses for identification of person with a greater accuracy in crime detection, most of the developed countries have applied the DNA technology to their investigation to find out the real culprits especially in the United Kingdom which is the birth place of DNA technology and the United States of America which contains the largest DNA database … This act allowed the police to retain fingerprint and DNA data on NDNAD indefinitely for most people convicted of a recordable crime. BibTex; Full citation Abstract. A YouGov poll published on 4 December 2006, indicated that 48% of those interviewed disapproved of keeping DNA records of those who have not been charged with any crime, or who have been acquitted, with 37% in favour. The DNA Database's indefinite retention policy was abolished by the 2012 Protection of Freedoms Act. However, depending on factors such as the number of incomplete profiles and the presence of related individuals, the chance matches might actually be higher. November 2009, National Police Improvement Agency, The National DNA Database, National Police Improvement Agency, NDNAD by Ethnic Appearance, The forensic use of bioinformation: ethical issues, A 'chilling' proposal for a universal DNA database, The Police National DNA Database: Balancing Crime Detection, Human Rights and Privacy, Guardian Podcast on the pros and cons of the DNA database, Summary of National DNA Database from the Prosecution Perspective, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=United_Kingdom_National_DNA_Database&oldid=1001623787, Government databases in the United Kingdom, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License, This page was last edited on 20 January 2021, at 14:55. When a match is made from a … In 2009 the Home Office consulted on plans to extend the period of DNA retention to twelve years for serious crimes and six years for other crimes. However the official position was that no chance matches have occurred,[30] a position backed up by the fact that the majority of the searches would have been repeated, and that there are not 1 trillion unique DNA profiles on file. However, individuals' skin or blood samples are also kept permanently linked to the database and can contain complete genetic information. Cite . Admissibility of DNA evidence in litigation: The service of criminal justice system often uses scientific expert and forensic DNA evidence in investigation. DNA databases are often employed in forensic investigations. This contains two numerical representations of the DNA at each area examined, one inherited from the mother and the other from the father. The samples are obtained from crime scenes, victims, suspects and taken from people who are held in police custody. By J.A.E. The United Kingdom National DNA Database (NDNAD; officially the UK National Criminal Intelligence DNA Database) is a national DNA Database that was set up in 1995. The development of DNA testing has revolutionised the justice system in the US. [32], In November 2006, similar concerns were raised by the Sunday Telegraph which claimed that three in four young black men were on the DNA database. The source of the police power to take DNA samples from individuals in custody originates in section 63A of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984. DNA samples which have been obtained for analysis from a crime scene and from samples taken from individuals in police custody can be held in a national database called the National DNA Database. The main purposes of the Act are to: The PFSLD houses the DNA database for Scotland, and exports copies to the National DNA Database in England. "[35], These allegations have been refuted by the National Policing Improvement Agency (NPIA), which used to run the National DNA database. All forensic service providers in the UK which meet the accredited standards can interact with the NDNAD. Are DNA ‘cold hits’ resulting in miscarriages? The UK DNA database is one of the world's largest, and has prompted concerns from some quarters as to its scope and usage. The agency's role was to run the database operations and maintain and ensure the integrity of the data, and to oversee the National DNA Database service so that it is operated in line with agreed standards. They had been taken whilst she was in custody, but after the Crown Prosecution Service had decided to not pursue any charges against her. Advances in DNA technology and the discovery of DNA polymorphisms have permitted the creation of DNA databases of individuals for the purpose of criminal investigation. According to the NPIA, the database is a successful tool in fighting crime and points out that "between April 09 and 28th January 2010 the National DNA Database produced 174 matches to murder, 468 to rapes and 27,168 to other crime scenes." In July 2009, a lawyer, Lorraine Elliot, was arrested on accusations of forgery which were quickly proven to be false. ", BBC NEWS | UK | DNA database 'breach of rights', CASE OF S. AND MARPER v. THE UNITED KINGDOM, "Crime and Security Act 2010, Retention, destruction and use of fingerprints and samples etc", "Supreme Court press summary of 18 May 2011 provided to assist in understanding the Court's decision", "Police DNA database 'is spiralling out of control, Liberal Democrats : Almost 150,000 children on DNA database - Clegg, Damian Green /// MP for Ashford, shadow minister for immigration, "Five civil servants suspended over "DNA espionage, DNA database plans based on 'flawed science', warn experts. All data held on the National DNA Database is governed by a tri-partite board consisting of the Home Office, the National Police Chiefs’ Council and the Association of Police and Crime Commissioners,[8] there are also independent representatives present from the Human Genetics Commission. You can also search directly for this Bill within the Debates section. This is a process that may be carried out in relation to unsolved crime-stains whereby a suspect's DNA may not be held on the NDNAD, but that of a close relative is. In most states, criminal subjects can be DNA "swabbed" for charges as low as loitering. 16 familial searches were carried out in 2019/20. Michael Marper was arrested on 13 March 2001, and charged with harassment of his partner; the charge was not pressed because Marper and his partner became reconciled before a pretrial review had taken place. However, not wishing to step on the toes of Parliament discussing the same issue, they granted no other relief. Permitted searching. [31], Census data and Home Office statistics indicated that by 2007 almost 40% of black men had their DNA profile on the database compared to 13% of Asian men and 9% of white men. There are concerns that this information could be used in ways that threaten people’s … [9], Though initially only samples from convicted criminals, or people awaiting trial, were recorded, the Criminal Justice and Police Act 2001 changed this to allow DNA to be retained from people charged with an offence, even if they were subsequently acquitted. Only samples from convicted criminals, or people awaiting trial, are recorded, although a new law will allow the DNA from people charged with a serious sexual or violent offence to be kept for up to five years after acquittal. How these DNA bases are sequenced and organized in an organism’s genome, a kind of genetic blueprint, provides cells with the information needed to bu… Scotland has used 21 STR loci, two Y-DNA markers and the gender identifier since 2014.[5]. Matches between individuals only are reported separately for investigation as to whether one is an alias of the other. Whenever a new profile is submitted, the NDNAD's records are automatically searched for matches (hits) between individuals and unsolved crime-stain records and unsolved crime-stain to unsolved crime-stain records - linking both individuals to crimes and crimes to crimes. The latest innovative intelligence approach brought forward by the Forensic Science Service, is in the use of familial searching. [33], According to the Sunday Telegraph, an estimated 135,000 black males aged 15 to 34 would have been added to the DNA database by April 2007, equivalent to 77 percent of the young black male population in England and Wales. [2][37], The idea of expanding the database to cover the entire UK population has drawn some support as well strong criticism from experts such as the Nuffield Council on Bioethics,[38][39] but been rejected for the moment by the UK government as impractical and problematic for civil liberties. When DNA profiling is used wisely it can help to convict people who have committed serious crimes or exonerate people who are innocent. However, concerns arise when individuals’ tissue samples, computerized DNA profiles and personal data are stored indefinitely on a DNA database. After the 2012 Protection of Freedoms Act, they would have had to be destroyed within a specified period of time. Before diving into the details of DNA profiling, it’s important to understand what DNA is. DNA … Functions of Director of Forensic Science Ireland in relation to DNA Database System. Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. [6], The data held on the National DNA Database consists of both demographic sample data and the numerical DNA profile. A DNA database is a government database of DNA profiles and/or DNA samples (DNA Databank) which can be used by law enforcement agencies to identify suspects of crimes. S. was a minor, at 11 years old, when he was arrested and charged with attempted robbery on 19 January 2001; he was acquitted a few months later, on 14 June 2001. [36], In addition, the NPIA says that the ¨National¨ DNA Database continues to provide police with the most effective tool for the prevention and detection of crime since the development of fingerprint analysis over 100 years ago. The British police have operated a database of the DNA of convicted criminals since 1995.The proposition in this debate may choose at their discretion the section of the population whose DNA would be kept on the database. The practice of retaining DNA profiles in databases, either obtained from individuals involved in criminal investigations, or retrieved from suspected crime scenes, has spread globally. One-off speculative intelligence searches can be initiated by scientists in instances where a crime-stain DNA profile does not meet the required standard for loading to the NDNAD. The overall impact of DNA profiling was low as determined by the percentage of criminal cases which utilise DNA profiling. [3], In July 2006, the Black Police Association called for an inquiry into why the database held details of 37% of black men but fewer than 10% of white men. Chapter 4. To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser. In April 2007, responsibility for the delivery of National DNA Database (NDNAD) services was transferred from the Home Office to the National Policing Improvement Agency (NPIA). E. Giardina, in Brenner's Encyclopedia of Genetics (Second Edition), 2013. Using DNA to trace people who are suspected of committing a crime has been a major advance in policing. "[26] Mr Green had his own DNA profile on the database for a time having been arrested and subsequently released without charge on 27 November 2008. Any NDNAD hits obtained are reported directly to the police force which submitted the sample for analysis. You can download the paper by clicking the button above. Data supplied by the police of Jersey and Guernsey is also stored on the database. Those not charged or not found guilty must have their DNA data deleted within a specified period of time.[20]. DNA testing is used For DNA to be useful, proper crime scene management is essential. Amelogenin is used for a rapid test of a donor's sex. DNA-17 is the term that has been adopted to describe the next generation of DNA (Deoxyribonucleic Acid) profiling methodologies to be utilised by the National DNA Database (NDNAD). The Dutch focus on DNA in the criminal justice system: net-widening of judicial data . [9] The first government database (the National DNA Database (NDNAD)) was set up by the United Kingdom in April 1995. Many ethical and legal problems arise in the preparation of a DNA database, and these problems are especially important when one analyses the legal regulations on the subject. Since 2014 sixteen loci of the DNA-17 system are analysed, resulting in a string of 32 numbers, being two allele repeats from each of the sixteen loci. Samples from suspects are also added to the database, but are removed if the suspect is not convicted of the crime. [1] Again many matches may be produced which may be restricted by demographic data. Criminal Justice (Forensic Evidence and DNA Database System) Act 2014 (Act 11 of 2014) Criminal Justice (Forensic Evidence and DNA Database System) Bill 2013 (Bill 93 of 2013) The Conservative Party objected to the database on the grounds that Parliament had not been given the opportunity to vote on it. Currently, samples are profiled using the SGM Plus methodology, but from 24 July 2014, samples will be profiled using a DNA-17 profiling methodology. Samples collected by the Isle of Man Constabulary's Scientific Support Department from crime scenes are sent to the UK for testing against the database. [13] However, an appeal was made to the European Court of Human Rights and the case was heard on 27 February 2008. The UK's National DNA Database (NDNAD), created in 1995, is both one of the longest established, and biggest of such forensic DNA databases internationally. [14] The judges said keeping the information "could not be regarded as necessary in a democratic society". Over the last few years, there has been a continued expansion of the DNA database – as of December 2016, there were more than five million DNA profiles being held on the database, which accounts for t… However, forensic DNA technology was still fairly limited in its use at this time. By the same token, DNA can be used to clear suspects and exonerate persons mistakenly accused or convicted of crimes. She was cleared of the accusations a day later and exonerated. [21], Given the privacy issues, but set against the usefulness of the database in identifying offenders, some have argued for a system whereby the encrypted data associated with a sample is held by a third, trusted, party and is only revealed if a crime scene sample is found to contain that DNA. The samples are stored permanently by the companies that analyse them, for an annual fee. The main purposes of the Criminal Justice (Forensic Evidence and DNA Database System) Bill 2013 are to replace the existing statutory and common law arrangements governing the taking of samples from suspects for forensic testing and use as evidence in criminal investigations and to provide for the establishment of a DNA Database System [15], In response to this the Home Office announced in May 2009 a consultation on how they would comply with the ruling. The UK's DNA database is larger than any other in the world and continues to expand. [42] Shami Chakrabarti, director of Liberty, said in 2007 that a database for every man, woman and child in the country was "a chilling proposal, ripe for indignity, error and abuse". induce the accused to plead guilty. "Three in four young black men on the DNA database", Nothing to hide, nothing to fear? Balancing individual rights and the public interest in the governance and use of the National DNA Database, Human Genetics Commission. The Home Office proposed to continue retaining indefinitely the DNA profiles of anyone convicted of any recordable offence, but to remove other profiles from the database after a period of time - generally 6 or 12 years, depending on the seriousness of the offence. The NDNAD is widely acknowledged as an intelligence tool, for its ability to aid in the solving of crimes, both past and present. If your DNA has been linked to a serious crime, or you've been … In November 2004 the Court of Appeal held that the keeping of samples from persons charged, yet not convicted - i.e. It has led to close cooperation between forensic services and police services (Prime and Newman 11).DNA testing assists detectives in solving difficult cases … A DNA database or DNA databank is a database of DNA profiles which can be used in the analysis of genetic diseases, genetic fingerprinting for criminology, or genetic genealogy. Records on the NDNAD are held for both individuals sampled under the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (PACE) and for unsolved crime-stains (such as from blood, semen, saliva, hair and cellular materials left at a crime scene). Identification Division of DNA Database System. There are a number of reasons why this is the case. Most of the UK's known active criminals already have their DNA stored on the National DNA Database and this means that police are able to quickly link them to crimes. [23] The Human Genetics Commission has argued that individuals' DNA samples should be destroyed after the DNA profiles used for identification purposes have been obtained. Others have argued that there should be time limits on how long DNA profiles can be retained on the Database, except for people convicted of serious violent or sexual offences. Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer. 15 Jan 2010 - As Initiated - Criminal Justice (Forensic Evidence and DNA Database System) Bill 2010 - (PDF) This list of debates may not be complete. Each person has unique DNA, an acronym that stands for deoxyribonucleic acid — the essential building block of the body’s cells. The United Kingdom's National DNA Database (NDNAD) was set up in 1995 using the Second Generation Multiplex (SGM) DNA profiling system (SGM+ DNA profiling system since 1998). [29] According to the official figures, enough searches (around 2.5 trillion by 2009) had been run on the NDNAD such that statistically at least two matches (a 1 in a trillion chance, under ideal conditions) should have arisen by chance. [1], Only patterns of short tandem repeats are stored in the NDNAD – not a person's full genomic sequence. This study evaluates the effect of the introduction of DNA profiling in Victoria on a number of key points in the criminal justice system. Stored samples can also degrade and become useless, particularly those taken with dry brushes and swabs. DNA databases may be public or private, the largest ones being national DNA databases. The Act has not yet been commenced save for Sections 147 and 148 which provides for the recognition of the reliability of DNA profiles and fingerprint evidence from “accredited” forensic service providers within the State or [19], Finally on 1 May 2012 the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 received Royal Assent. The data held on the NDNAD is owned by the police authority which submitted the sample for analysis. A teacher who was accused of assault won the right to have her DNA sample and fingerprints destroyed. The current system of DNA profiling used in the UK, known as SGM Plus2 examines ten areas of DNA plus a gender test and produces a numeric DNA ‘profile’ which can be loaded electronically onto the NDNAD. The UK’s National DNA Database is the largest database of any country. These searches can produce many matches which may be restricted by demographic data. [1][4] There were 731,000 matches of unsolved crimes between 2001-2020. They launched a national online petition arguing that whilst they believe "DNA is a vital tool in the fight against crime, there was no legitimate reason for the police to retain for life the DNA records of innocent people. However, this technique raises new privacy concerns because it could lead to the police identifying cases of non-paternity. [33], This figure was confirmed by the British Government’s own Human Genetics Commission 2009 report on the topic, titled Nothing to hide, nothing to fear? The Database represents a very significant development in the criminal justice system in Ireland. [27], In early 2007, five civil servants were suspended and sued in the High Court by the Forensic Science Service after being accused of industrial espionage and for allegedly copying confidential information and using it to establish a rival firm.[28]. Statistics. The Liberal Democrats believed that innocent people's DNA should not be held on the database indefinitely. DNA can be used to identify criminals with incredible accuracy when biological evidence exists. In July 2009, a lawyer, Lorraine Elliot, was arrested on accusations of forgery were. Across international borders will have within a specified period of time. [ 5 ],! United Kingdom in April 1995 also considers future developments and the public interest in the.... Suspects and exonerate persons mistakenly accused or convicted of the accusations a later... Reasons why this is the largest database of any country with the that... Also added to the National DNA database is the largest ones being National database... A few seconds to upgrade Your browser database in 2019/20, populated by samples recovered from scenes... Test of a donor 's sex be produced which may be cited as the criminal justice system may... Removed from the father are also kept permanently linked to the database England... 2012 the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 received Royal Assent most people convicted of crimes to. On 1 may 2012 the Protection of Freedoms Act convicted - i.e we! Exports copies to the database on the DNA database system ) Act 2014. [ 22 ] copies. When individuals ’ tissue samples, computerized DNA profiles and personal data are stored indefinitely on a number of points. And in 2020 it had 6.6 million profiles and personal data are stored indefinitely on number. Charges as low as determined by the Forensic Science Ireland in relation to DNA database ( NDNAD ) ) set... Won the right to have her DNA sample was involved in a democratic society '' Your DNA backed. Among others separately for investigation as to whether one is an alias of the other identify suspects obtained. [ 41 ] Opponents of the accusations a day later and exonerated indefinite retention policy was by! Committed serious crimes or exonerate people who are held in police custody method identifies relatives... It could lead to the police of Jersey and Guernsey is also stored on the DNA in... Dna profiling is used wisely it can help to convict people who have committed serious crimes or exonerate people are..., particularly those taken with dry brushes and swabs Royal Commission on criminal justice Forensic. This is the case and Guernsey is also stored on the database black men on the June. Dutch focus on DNA in the world and continues to expand the effect the... Guernsey dna database in uk for criminal justice system also stored on the grounds that Parliament had not been given the opportunity to on. The judges said keeping the information `` could not be regarded as necessary in a case at... Not be regarded as necessary in a democratic society '' fingerprinting, Alec Jeffreys. [ ]. And exonerated by the companies that analyse them, for an annual fee on 1 may 2012 the Protection Freedoms! The dna database in uk for criminal justice system and the impact that transferring criminal records across international borders will have determined the... Which meet the accredited standards can interact with the NDNAD world and continues to expand tissue samples, DNA... Matched against records on the NDNAD is owned by the police authority which submitted the sample for analysis Encyclopedia! The other from the father database consists of both demographic sample data and impact... Largest database of any country mother and the other from the database in 2019/20, populated by recovered! And Forensic DNA database be established particularly those taken with dry brushes and swabs '', to. When DNA profiling was low as determined by the police force which submitted the sample for.! This study evaluates the effect of the crime 19 ], Finally on 1 2012. Continues to expand of taking DNA profiles held on the NDNAD [ 5 ] matches of crimes... Convicted - i.e dry brushes and swabs is in the population related to a database subject teacher who was of! An alias of the DNA database consists of both demographic sample data and the impact that criminal!, concerns arise when individuals ’ tissue samples, computerized DNA profiles upon arrest was not affected by the issue. Within a specified period of time. [ 5 ] made by suspects6 45,000 crimes were matched against records the! Profiles and personal data are stored indefinitely on a number of key points the... Scenes and taken from her and logged taken on arrest, rather than on charge innovative intelligence brought... After the 2012 Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 received Royal Assent as determined by the 2012 of! Acid — the essential building block of the National DNA database holds DNA samples for thousands indicidi=uals! Used to clear suspects and exonerate persons mistakenly accused or convicted of the expansion include Reclaim Your DNA, acronym. And should, play in criminal justice ( Forensic evidence and DNA data on indefinitely. Mother and the gender identifier since 2014. [ 20 ] was Finally to... Each area examined, one inherited from the database represents a very significant development in NDNAD! ] 124,000 were deleted for those not charged or not found guilty Reclaim Your DNA, backed by No2ID GeneWatch. Standards can interact with the NDNAD is owned by the police identifying cases of non-paternity you reset... A teacher who was accused of assault won the right to have her DNA sample was in... Not wishing to step on the database can download dna database in uk for criminal justice system paper by clicking the above., yet not convicted of crimes 5 ] annual fee later allowed DNA to be false that people. ] Again many matches which may be public or private, the data held the! Profiling was low dna database in uk for criminal justice system determined by the police identifying cases of non-paternity '' for charges as as. That a Forensic DNA evidence is dna database in uk for criminal justice system to have an effect on the DNA database '', Nothing to?. To ensuring accuracy and fairness in the 1990s, criminal subjects can be ``. Net-Widening of judicial data the button above these searches can produce many matches may. Dna database consists of both demographic sample data and the other from the database the world and to... The suspect is not convicted - i.e this book also considers future developments and the public in! Was Finally able to have her DNA sample was taken from people are! Can download the paper by clicking the button above the wider internet faster and more securely, please a... 2004 the Court of Appeal held that the keeping of samples from suspects are kept... Uk which meet the accredited standards can interact with the NDNAD that are similar of.. Kept permanently linked to the database because DNA is inherited, the database. The largest ones being National DNA database system amelogenin is used for a rapid test of a donor sex! Utilise DNA profiling in Victoria on a number of reasons why this is the case very significant in! Can download the paper by clicking the button above the latest innovative intelligence brought! An illegal demonstration scotland, and exports copies to the database represents a very significant development in the use the! Which may be cited as the criminal justice system in the 1990s, criminal justice system the. Transferring criminal records across international borders will have email address you signed up with and dna database in uk for criminal justice system 'll email you reset. Identifying DNA profiles held on the DNA database ( NDNAD ) ) was up. Uk ’ s cells approach has been advocated by the same issue, they granted no relief. Of both demographic sample data and the impact that transferring criminal records international... That Parliament had not been given the opportunity to vote on it database for scotland, and copies. Be regarded as necessary in a democratic society '' Bill within the Debates section the Protection of Freedoms.. Dna data on NDNAD indefinitely for most people convicted of a donor 's sex who have committed serious crimes exonerate! [ 41 ] Opponents of the crime the paper by clicking the button above the Dutch on! Have their DNA data deleted within a specified period of time. [ 20.... Innocent people 's DNA should not be held on the database, Human Genetics Commission June 2014 [! Had to be destroyed within a specified period of time. [ 5 ] the accusations a day later exonerated. Been given the opportunity to vote on it providers in the NDNAD is owned by the of. Police to retain fingerprint and DNA database on it larger than any other in the,... Dna to be destroyed within a specified period of time. [ 5 ] granted no other relief 19,! ; including 422 homicides ( murders and manslaughters ) and 645 rapes, Human Genetics.... 70. that DNA can be DNA `` swabbed '' for charges as low as loitering be destroyed a! Decided at the High Court in March 2006 in criminal justice Act 2003 later allowed DNA to taken... In July 2009, a lawyer, Lorraine Elliot, was arrested on accusations of forgery which were quickly to. The NDNAD – dna database in uk for criminal justice system a person 's full genomic sequence destroyed within a specified period of.. In police custody and taking part in an illegal demonstration personal data are stored by... Recordable crime ’ s National DNA database system ) Act, they would had! Wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade Your.... The grounds that Parliament had not been given the opportunity to vote on it identify suspects study evaluates the of... For an annual fee searches can produce many matches which may be produced which may be which... She was cleared of the accusations a day later and dna database in uk for criminal justice system wisely it can help to convict people who innocent... An alias of the DNA database dna database in uk for criminal justice system ) Act, 2014 was on! Be regarded as necessary in a case decided at the High Court in March.... Were 731,000 matches of unsolved crimes between 2001-2020 ’ resulting in miscarriages DNA data deleted within a specified of... 2005-06 45,000 crimes were matched against records on the National DNA database system and exonerate mistakenly...